Migration research: State Advisory Board for Integration provides guidance for migration policy in Baden-Württemberg

The political debate surrounding migration these days often resembles a raging fire, fueled more by emotions than facts. While talk shows and social media rage about upper limits and isolationist measures, a far quieter, but fundamentally more important discussion is taking place in experts' consulting rooms. It concerns the question of whether we are prepared to trade years of progress based on reason for short-term rhetorical gains. Amidst this vociferous battle, the State Advisory Board for Integration in Baden-Württemberg has issued a statement that we, as a law firm specializing in visa law, not only welcome but understand as an urgent appeal to the rule of law. When renowned academics and practitioners like Dr. Konstanze Jüngling or Prof. Dr. Annette Treibel-Illian warn against a relapse into purely deficit-oriented narratives, it touches upon the very core of our daily work and the future of Germany as a business location.

Science as an anchor in stormy times

It is significant that the State Advisory Board for Integration explicitly demands that migration policy break free from populist narratives . In our law firm, we are increasingly witnessing how legal frameworks are being undermined by political climates. The board rightly reminds us that migration is a normal component of a diverse society. At a time when the foundations of democracy and human rights are under pressure, academic expertise can no longer be treated as merely an "report for the archives ." The statement makes it clear that successful integration is not a matter of chance, but rather the result of continuity and reliable structures. Integration must not be made dependent on short-term cost-cutting measures or project-based approaches , as planning certainty is the fundamental prerequisite for effective work on the ground.

Legal certainty instead of political symbolism

A particularly critical point that we as lawyers see daily in visa law is the advisory board's demand to stop the deportation of well-integrated people in education or employment. Here, a gap often exists between the legal mandate and its political implementation. When people who are already part of our labor market are deported based on purely formal criteria, this undermines all efforts to combat the skilled worker shortage. The advisory board emphasizes the importance of the state agency for skilled worker immigration , which must be further developed as a digital management tool. We support the view that legal instruments such as integration management must be guaranteed as mandatory tasks, rather than being jeopardized by tight budgets.

The defense of human rights standards

In legal practice, adherence to the legal framework is essential. In its statement, the State Advisory Board emphasizes that the individual right to asylum and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) must not be relativized. This corresponds to the constitutional guarantees of the Basic Law. We are particularly concerned by the warning against the implementation of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). So-called secondary migration centers must not lead to de facto barriers or isolation structures that block access to education, the labor market, and independent legal advice. A state governed by the rule of law proves itself precisely in how it treats its most vulnerable members and guarantees procedures that enable genuine integration, rather than hindering it through accommodation concepts.

The state advisory board as an indispensable think tank

To prevent migration policy from degenerating into mere problem management, the State Advisory Council must be involved in state government projects at an early stage, as stipulated in Section 9, Paragraph 1 of the Participation and Integration Act (PartIntG) . The researchers propose developing the council into a genuine think tank, directly networked with the ministries through regular working-level meetings. We agree that a clear distinction between migration and integration policy is essential. Conflating the two provokes distorted debates and inaccurate attributions of responsibility. The diversity of stakeholders represented on the council is a crucial prerequisite for the legitimacy of policy recommendations.

Conclusion: A plea for reason and continuity

In summary, the statement by the State Advisory Board represents a much-needed corrective to the current culture of debate. The demand for the long-term funding of proven structures, the protection of human rights standards, and the abandonment of discriminatory narratives are not mere wishes, but necessities for social cohesion. A future state government would be well advised to utilize this academic potential to place migration policy back on a foundation of facts and the rule of law. Only if we understand migration as an opportunity and simultaneously address the challenges openly and without generalizations can we remain stable as a society.

How Visaguard can support you

As a specialized law firm for visa law, we guide you through the often confusing jungle of regulations. While politicians argue about new guidelines, we ensure that your rights to skilled worker immigration, residency, or family reunification are protected. We address the issues where bureaucratic hurdles hinder integration and fight for legally secure prospects – so that your future in Germany doesn't become a pawn in political rhetoric.

→ Book an appointment now and receive a response within 48 hours