
Schengen Visa
Visa lawyer explains all information about the Schengen visa, the Schengen area and Schengen history.
Share:

About this Page
Applying for a Schengen visa for a short-term stay in Germany can be a complex and nerve-wracking challenge. On this page, you will find all the necessary requirements, legal information, and practical step-by-step guides for a smooth visa process. Use our expert articles and legal assistance to successfully avoid common pitfalls and optimally plan your travel within the Schengen Area.
Table of Contents
1. Schengen visa problems of particular practical relevance
2. Most common problems with Schengen visas
3. Lawyer for Schengen visas
4. VISAGUARD services for Schengen visas
5. Your VISAGUARD benefits
6. FAQ and online resources
1. Schengen visa problems of particular practical relevance
These are the most important practical cases for lawyers in the field of Schengen law and Schengen visas:
Rejection of Schengen visas due to lack of intention to return
Rejection of Schengen visas due to lack of plausibility
Rejection of Schengen visas due to lack of means of subsistence
Urgent cases under Schengen law (e.g., impending deadline expiry)
Refusal of Schengen visas due to ongoing investigations (e.g. overstay)
It is unknown which documents should be submitted for the Schengen visa.
The embassy issues a regular Schengen visa instead of a multi-entry visa.
Appointment for Schengen visa not available
Your application for a Schengen visa will not be processed.
A D visa is applied for by mistake instead of a Schengen visa.
It is unclear whether or when it will be possible to work with a Schengen visa.
It is unclear what the requirements are for a posting with a Schengen visa.
2. Most common problems with Schengen visas
The greatest risk when applying for a Schengen visa is usually due to formal errors or deliberate inaction on the part of the embassy . While it does happen that applicants do not meet the requirements (e.g., lack of intent to return for a Schengen visa), this is relatively rare. Most visa problems abroad are caused by actual or perceived time pressure. Particularly in Asian and African countries, as well as some countries in the Middle East, embassy staff are very unreliable, slow, and often unwilling to process applications lawfully. The fact that many embassy staff are not German civil servants and that the diplomatic missions are not located in Germany often leads to a feeling of invulnerability among the staff. They frequently simply do not feel bound by the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Furthermore, the foreign mission's external communication is significantly more restrictive than required by law . Embassies actually have a duty to advise and inform (see Section 25 of the Administrative Procedure Act), which mandates supporting applicants. In practice, however, the exact opposite occurs: foreign missions frequently attempt to persuade applicants to withdraw their applications or not submit them in the first place by providing misleading, false, or even no information at all. A particularly common phenomenon is that applications are not even "accepted," even though embassies have no say in which applications they process.
As a result, many visa applications (from a lawyer's perspective) don't necessarily suffer from a lack of eligibility, but rather from the fact that German embassies and consulates feel only partially bound by German law. This leads to various consequences and problems for applicants in the administrative process at the embassies, which can often only be countered with extremely meticulous and painstaking procedures. Every document must be perfect (even if the law doesn't explicitly require it), applicants must provide more than is legally required in the interview regarding their reasons for applying (even if there's no legal basis for this), and they must be accommodating to embassy staff at every turn to avoid provoking any grounds for rejection. While this isn't strictly legal, from a purely economic standpoint, this "cooperation-driven" visa application process is often more efficient.
Specialist Articles on the Topic
3. Lawyer for Schengen visas
A lawyer should always be hired for a visa application in the following cases:
Speed : Applicants who require a swift and trouble-free visa process should consult a visa lawyer.
Legal certainty : Applicants and employers who place particular emphasis on compliance should engage a lawyer.
Legal proceedings : If a Schengen visa application has been rejected, a lawyer should be appointed (although a lawyer is not mandatory in the first instance).
Appointment not available: If no appointments are available at your embassy (e.g., appointment waiting list), you can instruct a lawyer to sue for an appointment.
Excessive processing time : If an application has been submitted but the embassy does not respond or the application has been taking far too long to process, a lawyer can expedite the processing.
Administrative law issues : If a case situation is unusual from an administrative perspective, a lawyer can be helpful in streamlining the process.
Advice : If you are unsure whether you or your documents meet the requirements for a visa, you can seek advice from a lawyer.
5. Your VISAGUARD benefits
As the name of our law firm (VISAGUARD) suggests, we are a legal services company specializing in visa law. We have dedicated our entire expertise to visa law and focus exclusively on this area. We are not only highly experienced in the broader field of residence and immigration law, but also specialize directly in the visa application process. While we also handle domestic proceedings before immigration authorities, we have particular expertise in representing clients before embassies and consulates (foreign missions). Unlike many other law firms that specialize solely in residence law, we understand the intricacies of visa law. We are familiar with the specifics of the Visa Handbook, visa regulations, the international portal, and the various communication channels with embassies and consulates.
We also have a direct line to the embassies. We know the staff members abroad and the specific procedures of the respective missions. We know how to contact the embassies directly and communicate appropriately with the relevant departments to foster cooperation from the staff. We consistently use this knowledge to the advantage of our clients. In addition, we have a strong service-oriented mindset and a high standard of service, so your case is guaranteed to be in good hands with us!
4. VISAGUARD services for Schengen visas
As a law firm specializing in visa law, we offer the following services:
Legal proceedings in the event of visa application rejections (appeals/ counter-appeals against refusal ).
Legal proceedings in particularly urgent cases ( preliminary injunction pursuant to Section 123 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act).
Legal proceedings in cases of long processing times ( action for failure to act ) or lack of availability of appointments (action for lack of appointment).
Advising applicants and employers before or during the Schengen visa process.
Representation of applicants and employers in the Schengen visa process at foreign missions.
Taking over communication with authorities involved in the visa process (e.g. Federal Employment Agency or Federal Office for Foreign Affairs).
Document review and assessment of compliance with requirements.
6. FAQ Schengen Visa
In your experience, what are the most frequent circumstances that lead to a Schengen visa being refused despite complete documentation?
A lack of intent to return and a lack of plausibility are usually the reasons for negative Schengen decisions. In our experience, it is often not the number of documents that is decisive, but rather whether the intention to return appears convincing to the embassy or consulate. Minor inconsistencies in the overall picture can carry more weight than missing individual documents.
What mistakes do applicants make in previous trips or visa applications that later cause unexpected problems with new Schengen visa applications?
Applicants are often unaware that applying for a D visa is a strong indication of a lack of intent to return. Many applicants underestimate how closely previous travel itineraries, lengths of stay, or prior statements are compared.
What differences do you observe in practice between uncomplicated Schengen visa procedures and cases that drag on for months with follow-up requests or remonstrations?
Financial resources are usually crucial, as they determine the “migration pressure”, which in turn influences the willingness to return.
What is a Schengen visa?
A Schengen visa is a residence permit that allows entry into and a short-term stay in Germany. It is generally issued for up to 90 days. A longer validity period does not automatically mean that a stay exceeding 90 days is permitted. The permitted length of stay can be checked using the European Commission's Schengen calculator.
Which countries belong to the Schengen Area?
The Schengen Area comprises 29 countries, including almost all EU member states such as Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, and the Netherlands (except Ireland and Cyprus), as well as non-EU countries such as Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein. Bulgaria and Romania have been partially integrated since March 31, 2024.
What is the idea behind the Schengen Area?
The Schengen idea is based on granting freedom of movement within Europe, similar to the free movement of goods in the single market. The aim is to promote mobility, trust, and common safety standards between participating states.
Court rulings on the Schengen visa
The intention to return is demonstrated, among other things, by: booking a return ticket, proof of financial resources in the country of residence, proof of employment, bank statements and property ownership, as well as proof of integration in the country of residence based on information about family ties and professional status. (VG Berlin, Judgment of 26.10.2012 - 22 K 30.12).
The authorities have a wide margin of discretion when assessing the willingness to return (Federal Administrative Court, judgment of 17 September 2015, 1 C 37.14; Administrative Court Berlin, judgment of 21 February 2014, file no. VG 4 K 232.11 V).
Schengen border controls are unlawful (VG Berlin, decision of May 22, file no. 28 L 270/26 A; Administrative Court (VG) Koblenz, judgment of April 27, 2026, file no. K 650/25.KO).
Even a deliberate overstay does not necessarily justify an expulsion interest (OVG Magdeburg, decision of August 11, 2025, file no. 2 M 64/25).
Blog posts about the Schengen visa
Statistics: Germany issued a total of 1.32 million Schengen visas in 2025.
EU strengthens the integration of security databases under Schengen law
Schengen border controls are illegal, according to the court.
Migration researchers warn of the consequences of Germany's illegal Schengen border policy.
Success through lawbreaking: 50% fewer illegal entries due to unlawful Schengen controls
Health insurance for foreign tourists in Germany – this is required under Schengen law.
European Council approves online platform for Schengen visas









