Compliance and labor law: What rules apply to workations?

The boundaries between office and leisure are blurring at a speed that German legislation can barely keep pace with. While the digitalization of the workplace theoretically makes working from a laptop on a Bali beach or from a home office in the Alps possible, these dreams often clash harshly with the reality of the current legal framework . In our consulting practice, we repeatedly see that highly qualified professionals and innovative companies misunderstand the term "workation" as a synonym for boundless freedom. But the bitter truth is: there is no legal entitlement to a workation in Germany . Anyone who relocates their workplace abroad without sound legal protection not only risks employment-related warnings but may also find themselves entangled in a dangerous thicket of illegal residence and social security violations . Especially given the massive shortage of skilled workers and the sluggish digitalization of immigration administration, it is almost ironic that bureaucratic hurdles are placed in the way of dedicated talent when they demand modern ways of working.

The right to give instructions as an insurmountable obstacle?

In public discourse, it is often argued that mobile working should be a fundamental right of modern employees. Legally, however, we are operating within a rigid framework . The workplace is generally subject to the employer's right to determine the employee's location. Conversely, this means that workation requires an explicit and mutually agreed-upon arrangement between both parties. We observe critically that many companies, fearing legal complexities, categorically reject workation instead of seeking modern solutions. Legally, workation simply means a temporary relocation of the workplace. A well-structured supplementary agreement, ideally with a fixed term and clearly defined terms, can protect both sides from unpleasant surprises . We advocate proactively drafting these agreements, for example, by including a right of recall for operational emergencies, in order to safeguard the employer's legitimate need for security.

The bureaucratic trap: Social security and posting

A particularly critical point, often overlooked in political discussions, is the classification of workations within the European Union. Many employees are lulled into a false sense of security, believing that freedom of movement also covers mobile working without any issues. However, legally, workations within the EU are regularly classified as postings of workers . This entails strict adherence to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No. 883/2004 . Without a corresponding A1 certificate, employers face fines and employees risk gaps in their insurance coverage. We believe it is imperative that migration policy create more flexible framework conditions to prevent the mobility of skilled workers from being stifled by outdated forms. It is unacceptable that highly educated immigrants, who contribute to economic growth in Germany, should be thwarted by bureaucratic hurdles when undertaking a short work assignment in their home country or a third country.

Visa law and third countries: A dance on the edge of a volcano

Things become even more complex when the journey extends beyond the EU's borders. Particular caution is advised for non-EU citizens, whose residence permits are often tied to a specific purpose or even a permanent residence in Germany. Holders of an EU Blue Card who work abroad for months without prior consultation risk losing their residence permit . This highlights the lack of digitalization in migration administration: coordination between immigration authorities, tax offices, and health insurance companies is often sluggish. Not every country is suitable for workation , as significant social security and tax risks arise without thorough vetting. We therefore strongly recommend clearly defining the permissible countries in advance and also clarifying legal issues regarding liability for the loss of work equipment abroad.

Co-determination and collective agreements

In larger companies, the works council also comes into play. While individual solutions may be exempt from co-determination, collective workation programs immediately trigger co-determination rights . The works council has a significant say when it comes to the "how" of mobile work. Even though there is still no legal entitlement to the introduction of such programs, forward-thinking companies are advised to establish structured processes. We criticize the often protracted negotiations within companies, which are causing Germany to lose its appeal in the international competition for top talent. Highly qualified migrants expect flexibility – if the German legal framework does not offer this, they will likely choose a different location.

Conclusion: Structure beats risk

In summary, workation is far more than simply traveling with a laptop. It's a highly complex construct encompassing labor law, social security law, and immigration law. Anyone embarking on this path without a written agreement and a review of double taxation treaties is acting negligently. A legally sound arrangement protects against the loss of insurance coverage or even residency permits. We urge policymakers to implement a bolder reform of migration administration to support such modern work models, rather than hindering them with rigid regulations.

How Visaguard supports you

As a specialized law firm for visa and employment law, we support you in implementing workation models in a legally compliant manner. We examine the immigration implications of stays abroad for third-country nationals, draft individual supplementary agreements to employment contracts , and advise you on the complexities of social security in an international context. With Visaguard at your side, we transform legal risks into practical flexibility for your talent.

→ Book an appointment now and receive a response within 48 hours